Google Scholar – a vast database of state and federal case regulation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
Some pluralist systems, including Scots regulation in Scotland and types of civil law jurisdictions in Quebec and Louisiana, tend not to specifically fit into the dual common-civil regulation system classifications. These types of systems could have been closely influenced by the Anglo-American common regulation tradition; however, their substantive regulation is firmly rooted from the civil legislation tradition.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have listened to the realized counsel for the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments given that the issues with the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard into the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(one) in the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession in the subjected premises into the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to become decided with the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer while in the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court needs to see this facet for interim custody of the topic premises When the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
Sign up for E-mail Notification of recent opinions The cases listed below have experienced opinions filed for them within the last 14 days. The following information is accessible for Each individual case: Information Sheet - Click a case number to view case details, including signing JusticesJudges and participating attorneys.
thirteen. The Supreme Court has held that as soon as the act of misconduct is founded plus the employee is found guilty after due process of regulation, it is the prerogative from the employer to decide the quantum of punishment, outside of the different penalties provided in law. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed is not really proportionate with the seriousness on the act of misconduct just isn't sufficient but the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion in a very structured and lawful manner. Read more
As being the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has become reached, therefore the decision from the Supreme Court needs to be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) from the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
116 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Mobile Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD twelve Justice with the Peace u/s 22-A is not really obliged to afford a possibility of hearing on the accused party; nor obliged to always or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is needed to take into consideration all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid equipment of criminal legislation from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are several of the relevant factors. Read more
Should you find an error inside the content material of a published opinion (for instance a misspelled name or maybe a grammatical error), please notify the Reporter of Decisions. TVW
, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling around the same sort of case.
Summaries offer concise explanations of legal principles and significant cases pertaining to land ownership, real estate transactions, property rights, and related matters, assisting you in understanding the intricacies of land and property regulation.
In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative on the law laid down from the Supreme Court during the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. Thus, the competent authority in the parent department of the petitioner plus the Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount of the petitioner and shell out the pension amount and other ancillary benefits to your petitioner to which He's entitled under the legislation within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority on the respondent can also be directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits from the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more
These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and incorporate all notable cases decided via the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.
171 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It really is properly set up now that the provision for proforma promotion just isn't alien or unfamiliar on the civil servant service composition but it's already embedded in Fundamental Rule 17, wherein it's lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority might if pleased that a civil servant who was entitled to become promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his possess, wrongfully prevented from rendering service on the Federation/ province inside the higher post, direct that these here kinds of civil servant shall be paid the arrears of pay out and allowances of these higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming towards the main case, it is also a well-recognized proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is subject matter to your procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings about the evidence.